Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Seeing Systems: A Conceptual Resource

Ned O'Gorman, Melissa Seifert, Kevin Hamilton, Nikki Weickum, Fabian Prieto-Nanez, elizaBeth Simpson, Gabe Malo, Kristina Williams, Natalie Lambert, Jeffrey Proulx, Jessica Robinson, Jessica Landau, Sally Jackson, Ned Prutzer, Mary Grace Hebert, Matt Pitchford, Paul McKean, Authors
System, page 2 of 3

Other paths that intersect here:
 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Model

Models in systems theory seem to be means of both understanding and testing systems. We create a model to extract or identify "essential or interesting features that can be studied through analysis of the model" (Poole, 60). 

Models would seem to need to be formal--that is, they are characterized by rigorous methods, formal rules, and other means of rule-bound abstracting and idealizing. 

Poole does mention informal models--or "models expressed in ordinary language" (60)--but the latter seems to me (Ned O) not to be a model at all, since but rather more generically a representation

Yet, not all models are representations: one could create a model of a system that in no way claims to re-represent something in the empirical world. 
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Model"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path System, page 2 of 3 Next page on path