This comment was written by Anastasia Kim on 20 Nov 2022.
Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Micro-Landscapes of the AnthropoceneMain MenuMarginal WorldsPlant WorldsAnimal WorldsAmy Huang, Natasha Stavreski and Rose RzepaWatery WorldsInsect WorldsBird-Atmosphere WorldsContributed by Gemma and MerahExtinctionsMarginal WorldsSam, Zach and AlexE-ConceptsAn emergent vocabulary of eco-concepts for the late AnthropoceneSigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7d
River-worlds, Sea-worlds, Ocean-worlds
12022-11-18T13:53:52-08:00Anonymous309862Anastasia Kimplain2022-11-20T19:55:29-08:00Sigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7dIn response to Amelia’s and Bridget’s close reading of T.S. Eliot’s “The Dry Salvages”, I ponder the implications of noumena and a theory of river-worlds, which I define as: “A river-world can be defined as a physical, social, or virtual network consisting of many links between key nodes such as plants, animals, or humans which multiply geometrically in number with each new added node. The combined effect of these links on a node is enough to pull other nodes in and to reinforce current connections to the river-world to such an extent that it is often difficult to change or escape it – or even to realise that other river-worlds exist in parallel.” Although phenomena instructs us to exist inside human temporality, perspective, narrative, and worlds, I agree with Eliot and explore the possibility of living outside the human world through the lens of water – and in particular rivers – as an agency, an ontopower, a network effect enabling us to transcend the human. Rivers, seas, and oceans all have the power of flow and moving the human from one place to another – the power to displace the human from significance into the insiginificant. In light of Eliot’s deification of the river as a “monotheistic “strong brown God” and the sea in polyphonic plurality as embodying “many gods and many voices””, one can extend the idea of the river as the emergence of a bigger cluster of tighter connections between entities, the sea as the composition of 2 of more of such clusters in close proximity, and the ocean as the entire totality of all rivers and seas merging. In this way one can describe the universe not in terms of matter or phenomena, but in terms of the flow of connections, perspectives, consciousness, agents, and ontpowers. Word count: 295
1media/41078165_243457556511570_5507778030740701184_n.jpgmedia/DSC_0105.jpg2018-09-06T04:25:21-07:00Sigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7dClose Readings of Literary Texts25Compilation of Close Readings of Literary Textsimage_header2021-03-21T01:29:08-07:00Sigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7d