Janeblogger

E-LEARNING TAKING OVER THE TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM LEARNING?

E-learning instruments provide access to resources that teachers and learners could not otherwise have had, regardless of their status or place. It has made learning so much easier than a student of Psychology in Australia can study the course from the best professor who is miles away, probably on a different continent.

In today's fast-paced working environments, presenting vast data in the classroom to teach basics of any subject might seem like an age-old decision when you really can just take the benefits of eLearning through eBooks, internet manuals, online handbooks, audio and video training to convey vast information. It can also provide learners with a coherent learning experience.

For college-going students, it has become a whole new world of learning, probably their career lifelines. Nowadays many colleges are offering online courses to the students. Even the exams are no more traditional. The examinations for these e-learning courses basically comprises of writing assessments that they submit online through the college portal.

Where exactly is classroom learning lacking?

Educators will inform you in a traditional classroom that they need to be on their toes, attempting to engage their learners at all times. But learners may not always cooperate — maybe they are bored out, zoned out, or too outwardly concentrated on the sun to pay attention to math. Failure to engage is also a challenge for the student. They can't hit a teacher pause and return to the portion where they stopped paying attention, which implies they'll miss it.

Where exactly does e-learning need to cope up?

The primary distinction between eLearning and the traditional classroom training is that classroom training enables learners to communicate at a personal level in a live setting with teachers and other learners, while learners must rely on technological media to communicate with the eLearning course. While in a classroom, there is always someone to motivate and evaluate the performance of the students in a classroom; whereas the students need to be self-independent and driven as well as disciplined in order to benefit from an eLearning course. Well, not everybody is self-driven. As e-learning makes it difficult to clear doubts every time, most of the students look for outside help. This help comes in the form of online education websites cum guidance cum my assignment help websites. There are multiple such trusted websites that provide online tutoring to the students when they have to clear their doubts or require any other assignment help.

What exactly differs both systems apart?

In classroom situations, tracking the progress of students in the training program is generally performed manually, which can sometimes result in inaccurate information recording. The method of evaluating the progress of learners in the classroom also consumes an enormous amount of time and workforce. Whereas eLearning courses are automatically and easily delivered in an efficient manner on the Learning Management Systems (LMSs), which is a software platform that helps in tracking and monitoring the progress of the learners.

From being a niche of technical topics, eLearning has graduated as one increasing, preferred and almost vital manner to learn and teach everything. People's needs and willingness to know everything at their appropriate speed and make eLearning the goal for a number of businesses at their convenient moment. eLearning's popularity is experiencing fresh heights, particularly with technology development.

But even while e-learning has become an educational equalizer, the traditional classroom is still not a substitute. The technology is progressing, of course, but it is not perfect. E-learning is facing its own difficulties, just like any fresh, burgeoning development.

But the question is still in debate if e-learning can overpower the interactive and communicative classroom learning!

Or maybe instead of one system taking over another, both the learning techniques can amalgamate to form an entirely new future classroom. Classrooms can move to co-learning spaces with enhanced resources and decreased workloads for teachers. In a cooperative setting, students can come, learn, engage — all at their own pace. And that's the real educational objective: to build the finest learning atmosphere for learners.

It seems like both systems have their own constraints and benefits. It relies on one's learning needs and strategy. What do you have to say about this? We'd really like to know how you feel about it. Please share your point of perspective.