Sign in or register
for additional privileges

ENGL665: Teaching Writing with Technology

Shelley Rodrigo, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Kim Digital Literacy Narrative

Concept: 3rd person narration over screencast video of PowerPoint with relevant images and then live scrolling through Carr’s online article.


Script: (Note: Narration in video may not 100% match written script)

This story of a digital literacy epiphany starts in an unlikely place: an alphabetic text. It all started when our heroine, Kim Fahle, took a course on Modernist Periodicals. For this course, she was assigned to read George Bornstein’s Material Modernism: The Politics of the Page. In this book Bornstein argues for modernist scholars to pay attention to the materiality and situatedness of modernists texts in their original publications and how these texts change when placed in new contexts. Bornstein uses Benjamin’s concept of “aura”

“Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space” (cited in Bornstein, 2001, pg. 6)

And McGann’s notion of bibliographic code:

“Bibliographic code can include features of page layout, book design, ink and paper, and type face as well as broader issues which D.F. McKenzie might call ‘the sociology of texts,’ like publisher, print run, price, or audience” (p. 7).

Essentially, Bornstein is arguing that material considerations including font, page layout, what a text was published alongside--other texts, images, ads--shape the meaning produced by the text, and when we read these texts in decontextualized contexts, like in anthologies, we lose some of the meaning generated from this context. When our heroine read this, she was like OMG! Yes! This makes so much sense! And this led to a fun project on the Modernist Magazine BLAST and its use of materiality to promote active and “masculine” reading practices. But the full breadth of the lessons of this moment would come into sharper focus at a later moment in our heroine’s literacy journey.


Fast forward a few years. The setting: a small home office. There is a desk and comfy office chair, papers strewn around an open laptop. A cat winding around our heroine’s leg. Basically, the scene is as you would expect for a teacher preparing a lesson. But this stereotypical setting is about to be home to a transformational moment for our heroine. Though she had been exposed to notions of materiality and situatedness of texts, these ideas had grown dim as her brain was consumed with grading, grading, and more grading. Our heroine, who now found herself as an adjunct at a community college, was preparing to reread a text she had read before. The text: Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid.” She had read this text a few months earlier reproduced in a reader for college writing courses that was being considered by her institution for use in composition classes. So when planning her syllabus for the coming semester, she had thought it would be a good essay to assign for a developmental reading course linked to a composition course. “This will be a challenging text to tackle towards the end of the semester,” she thought, “and we will be reading a text talking about reading in a class on reading--how Meta!” She was convinced this would be a good assignment. Also, luckily for our heroine, Carr’s text is available online, so she and her students would be able to easily access it.


So the time had come to reread Carr’s text to prepare for class. Our heroine was sitting in her comfy chair, occasionally petting her persistent cat, when she opened the link to Carr’s text. Let’s take a moment to journey into our heroine’s mind to witness her experience…


Kim’s monologue:

“Hmmm interesting image. I wonder how it relates?”

(scroll)

Highlight and read: “My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.”

(Continue Scrolling)

“Marshal McLuhan--I don’t know who that is” (click on hyperlink, look at Wikipedia page) “Hmmm, ‘the meaning is the message,’ interesting.”

“Ok…” (Back to scrolling Carr’s article, get distracted by side ad for most popular stories)

(Ad lib about popular articles recommended)

(highlight pulled out quote)  

“Hmm. Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of Brain Reading” (clicks on hyperlink and gets taken to Amazon page) “Cool, maybe I’ll add this to my wish list”

(Continue to scroll, sees as the bottom links to additional pages of the article). “Whoa 3 more pages. My students are going to hate me. Alright here we go, page 2...maybe I’ll grab a snack first”


And then suddenly a light bulb went off for our heroine. She had just experienced exactly what Carr was discussing. Hadn’t she been easily distracted by hyperlinks and invitations to check out something else of interest? Hadn’t she found herself wishing the article was more concise, more digestible? Our heroine thought back, had it been like this when she had read Carr’s article in textbook? She didn’t think so. Now of course, the situations weren’t immediately comparable. The first reading had been deep because she was unfamiliar with the text and needed to know the essay’s argument and subpoints. This reading was meant as a brush up to prepare to discuss the text in class. But the day’s experience had left an impression on our heroine nonetheless. She understood Carr’s argument in a way she hadn’t before and began thinking of her students and what their reading experiences might be like as they were preparing for class. Were they intimidated by the length? Were they distracted? Our heroine decided that she wanted to discuss their reading experiences in class, because as she had seen herself, their experience would connect to and inform Carr’s discussion. She also realized, perhaps for the first time, that while she had spent the semester helping her students use strategies to be effective and critical readers, she might need to offer strategies specific to online or digital reading, as this was where much of the reading many of her students do in their everyday lives takes place. Developing resources and strategies for digital reading is a quest our heroine is still on to this day, and as she becomes more digitally literate herself, she thinks about how she can pass on these lessons to her students. Our heroine realized from this experience that she might agree with Carr’s argument that the internet changes the way we read, but instead of being frustrated or saddened by this, she is inspired to find ways to use these new types of reading to help students become more critical readers, writers and thinkers.

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Kim Digital Literacy Narrative"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Kim Fahle Bio, page 12 of 25 Next page on path