Sign in or register
for additional privileges

East Asian Youth Cultures Spring 2015

Globalized Identities, Localized Practices, and Social Transitions

Dwayne Dixon, Author
Neoliberalism, page 1 of 10
Previous page on path     Next page on path

Other paths that intersect here:

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Burden of the Individual

Consumption has become a prime mover. Increasingly, it is the factor, the principle, held to determine definitions of value, the construction of identities, and even the shape of the global ecumene.


 –Jean & John Comaroff


Ever since the 1980s,  ‘teens’ emerged as a consumer category with its own distinctive, characterized, internationally marketable culture. More so than ever, ‘youth’ as a category gained unprecedented autonomy as a social category, especially as a separate class from the normative world of work and wage (Jean & John Comaroff). We also know that neoliberalism inherently favors some and not others. It can include and marginalize populations; it can produce more products yet decrease jobs; above all it can promise riches and perceived success to those that can master, but strip away the vitality of those that can’t. The construction of one’s identity, then, is commodified, and increasingly measured by the capacity to transact and consume (Jean & John Comaroff). Individual interest, self-improvement, and development of one’s social and literal capital, becomes a symptom of neoliberalism. The more people can shape and customize their lives, the more that can be sold and consumed by the individual.


Thus, the transfer of responsibility from the state to the individual is complete. Youth, in the postwar generation, assume the burden of increasing his/her own capacity. They are drawn into a world of luxury, promises, and hope but at the expense of one’s self-improvement. They are told that self worth can be enhanced materialistically, but only if they have what it takes. It is no longer the state’s responsibility to provide adequate healthcare or social programs for development, but up to the individual to provide for the self. 


Sources:


Comaroff, J., and J. L. Comaroff. "Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming." Public Culture 12.2 (2000): 291-343. Web.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Burden of the Individual"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Neoliberalism, page 1 of 10 Next page on path

Related:  Precarious RelationshipsCase Study: The Use of Dialect in the Rise of the Cantonese Hip-Hop ScenePrecarious Work and Flow of culture between bordersAlternatives to the Ideal Path: Precarious Labor for Chinese MigrantsCommodification of the Intellectual on Neoliberal Youth DevelopmentJapan's Recession: Blaming the VictimIntersection of Neoliberalism and Precarious LaborThe Normalization/Homogenization of an 'Ideal' Beauty Standard: Capitalist Strategy & GlobalizationSuicide in East AsiaUtilization of Social Capital by Precarious YouthEnjo KosaiNeoliberalismEducational Pressures: Ijime, Truancy, and the Rise of SuicideYouth as a Site of Moral PanicTensions Between Workers & Market/SocietyGlocalization of Hip-Hop within East AsiaOffline Third Spaces: Anime Conventions as Sites of DesireEconomicsHip-Hop's Role in Chinese Youth CulturePostmodern Korea: Self-Actualization and the Transfer of ResponsibilityGlobalization & Neo-liberal Commodification of Youth IdentityThe Normalization of Cosmetic Surgery in South Korea: Investment in Self-Development & Women as Consumer BodiesContextualizing Hip-Hop in Japan and Its Role in Youth CultureWorth of the BodyEducation in Taiwan: Set for FailureLesqueEducation and its Effects on the Development of East Asian Youth CultureThe Gendered Impact of Neoliberalism and the Patriarchy in JapanFreetersA Brief History on Hip-Hop