One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated.
Annotation #1In our first class discussion we will discuss some of the most salient characteristics of digital humanities work. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:
1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.
You should annotate as you read because it:
- ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
- minimizes the need to re-read
- makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out
Annotating with Hypothes.isIn this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.
Evaluating DH ProjectsThe project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
- How is the project set up?
- Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
- What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements?
- Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?