Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Cesar Chavez's Video Collection

Curtis Marez, Author
Overture, page 1 of 1
Previous page on path 

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Overview


This project grows out of a book, Farm Worker Futurism: Speculative Technologies of Resistance (University of Minnesota Press, 2016), an interdisciplinary study of the material and symbolic significance of technology in conflicts between agribusiness corporations and workers of color in California from about the 1940s to the 1990s and beyond. An important practical and symbolic means of exploiting and disciplining labor, agribusiness technology also became the medium and object of struggle over the future of California agriculture and the larger cultural and political context supporting it. Farm workers have opposed mechanization in the fields, industrial work camps, and perhaps most famously, pesticides. They have also responded to agribusiness efforts to dominate the visual field by turning a critical gaze on agribusiness in numerous graphics, photos, films, and videos, thus decoupling technology from an exclusive connection to patriarchal, white capitalism. 

The fact that technology has been both an object and means of farm-worker media making has encouraged self-reflexive strategic efforts to transform postwar visual culture. Farm-worker unions did not simply change what audiences saw, but instead attempted to alter how they saw agribusiness, intervening in the hierarchical relations of looking that structured the agribusiness-dominated mediascape, and instead promoting new kinds of activist spectatorship among farm workers and their supporters. This project thus focuses on struggles over technology in general and visual technologies in particular, including moving picture cameras, video cameras and players, and computer screens. 

Coined in his famous study of California agriculture, Carey McWilliams’s memorable phrase “farm fascism” refers to the agribusiness coupling of public and private police violence with aggressive efforts to use the media to control public opinion. Visual technologies were an important component of these corporate efforts to control workers and public opinion, and not only because big growers and the local police who supported them often used cameras to observe and harass farm workers.

One index of farm worker exploitation is the fact that they have often been the objects but rarely the subjects of media representation. There is a vast archive of iconic photos and films of farm workers, but there are far fewer well-known examples of visual media produced by them. This is to say that the exploitation of farm workers—their material objectification or commodification as labor power—partly depends on technologies of visual culture, including the agribusiness-dominated relations of looking that have symbolically reproduced farm worker subordination and abjection.

In such contexts, California farm-worker unions have struggled to organize workers and produce their own media—press, photography, and film—in opposition to the agribusiness domination of visual technology. Farm workers have undermined agribusiness representations of workers as mere machines of production by themselves mobilizing media technologies. Appropriations of cameras and other visual technologies by farm worker unions have both a material and symbolic force, making exploitation visible while simultaneously seizing the means of visual reproduction.

The phrase speculative technologies thus has multiple meanings. First, it refers to agribusiness technologies aimed at limiting the risk to investment in an inherently risky industry, dependent on the contingencies of nature and markets and therefore obsessed with labor control. And by implication, the phrase further references farm worker engagements with technology, especially visual technology. Indeed, the adjective "speculative" is etymologically related to terms suggesting technologically mediated forms of looking or observation such as watchtowers, scientific lenses, mirrors, magnifying glasses and telescopes. Finally, I mean “speculative” to suggest some of the meanings associated with the term in literary and film criticism, where, among other things, it describes creative works of imaginative world building, for both agribusiness and farm workers have appropriated visual technologies to imagine competing visions of alternative social orders.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Overview"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Overture, page 1 of 1